David Pastrnak Has Fractured Foot; No Timetable For Return To Bruins

by

David Pastrnak’s foot injury is more severe than originally anticipated.

Pastrnak, who has missed the Boston Bruins’ last four games, has been diagnosed with a non-displaced fracture in his foot, according to general manager Don Sweeney.

?With David?s case, things changed a little bit,? Sweeney told reporters Wednesday, via The Boston Globe. ?The initial X-rays were normal. We waited for swelling to go down. The symptoms were still persisting, so we went to have a more definitive CT scan. And it did reveal a small, non-displaced crack in an awkward location, so we have to give him some time.

?The course of action doesn?t change for him, except he just needs a little more rest.?

Sweeney reportedly did not offer a timetable for the 19-year-old winger’s return.

Pastrnak did not practice Tuesday or Wednesday, and he will not play Thursday when the Bruins host the Colorado Avalanche. His spot on Boston’s second line as of late has been filled by rookie Frank Vatrano, who scored one goal and tallied eight total shots on goal in two games over the weekend.

Defenseman Torey Krug also missed practice Tuesday and Wednesday, with head coach Claude Julien deeming both “maintenance” days. Julien said he expects Krug to play against Colorado.

“I?d be leaning more toward ?yes,? ” Julien said, via the Bruins’ official Twitter account.

Thumbnail photo via Bob DeChiara/USA TODAY Sports Images

Previous Article

Yankees Acquire Aaron Hicks From Twins In Exchange For John Ryan Murphy

I’d say it kind of started in the 80’s as I remember it. In the early 80’s and 70’s, usually the same 11 guys were on the field for every play, and then you got a little bit to the third receiver, but the tight ends were pretty good and those guys were good receivers – they weren’t really guys you were looking to take off the field. So you played the same 11 guys on offense, you played the same 11 guys on defense. There was a little bit of nickel defense in the late 70’s where teams would put in a defensive back for a linebacker, but it was the same thing. It was just kind of a one-for-one substitution. Then I think you saw teams like Washington when [Joe] Gibbs was there have the big back, whether it was George Rogers or [John] Riggins or whoever it was, and then they had [Joe] Washington or Kelvin Bryant or that type of player as their sub back, and it would be a true one-for-one situation. We did that at the Giants, had a lot of success with [Dave] Meggett, Tony Galbreath, guys like that. That was into the late 80’s and the 90’s and then a lot of teams started doing it where they found that third-down back first of all was less of a load for one guy to be out there for every single play, and then secondly the skills of that player, ability to separate and have quickness and make plays with his hands in the passing game as opposed to just the ball carriers, sometimes you could have both instead of just trying to find one guy to do everything, which is harder … There are always going to be some backs in the league that can do that, but I think it was a little easier to find two guys rather than find one who can do everything or find two – one to do it and one guy to back him up. It was a way of splitting the load. So I’d say that’s kind of evolved, evolved trough the mid-80s and by probably a decade later it’s the way a lot of teams were going. When you had guys like Tony Dorsett and Billy Sims and Thurman Thomas and guys like that, you didn’t need to sub anybody. You put them in there, do whatever you want with them – throw it to them, run 20 times a game. They were all really good at that. But the specialization gives in particular with Washington and the guys that went on from his system like Dan Henning and guys like that. They adopted that same type of philosophy. Q: Who is the best one that you’ve coached? BB: We’ve been lucky. We’ve had a lot of good players at that position. Certainly Meggett was … And again it depends on what the guy’s role was. The thing about Meggett was he gave you all those plays in the kicking game – kickoff returns and punt returns, as well as third downs – so he was a very impactful player in terms of the number of times that he would catch the ball. Kevin [Faulk] probably caught more passes than Meggett did, but he didn’t have the same production in the return game. Probably had more production as a running back, actually carrying the ball. But going back to Tony Galbreath, he did a great job for us at the Giants.
Next Article

Tom Brady: Dion Lewis’ Old Role ‘Pretty Important’ In Patriots Offense

Picked For You